X-Men: The Last Stand

X-Men: The Last Stand is fast, explosive, exciting and thoroughly Marvel-ous (I'm sorry). It excells as a comic-book movie. The action is bigger and deeper than in the other X-Men films. The fight scenes nicely showcase the mutant abilities of everyone present, including Kelsey Grammer (Down Periscope)'s Beast, Shadowcat and several new badguys. Thankfully director Brett Ratner doesn't continue Brian Singer's habit of showcasing each mutant in turn, as if they were queueing up to take part in the fight like bond villain henchmen.

But action, even in an action movie, is not enough to make a film. The Last Stand's plot has a stronger foundation than the previous films too. For people who don't live in the centre of the Hollywood hype machine as I do, the basis of the film is that the American government has developed a cure for mutancy. Some mutants who want to fit in welcome the cure. Others who define themselves by their mutation are opposed to the idea of a cure. Think of the outcry if someone was to develop a 'cure' for homosexuality and you get some idea of Magneto (Ian McKellen, Last Action Hero)'s position in this film. So there's definitely a challenging issue to deal with in this plot.

Unfortunately the focus of the film is split. Partly it tries to tackle the ethical issues surrounding the cure, in particular the divergence in the stances of Magneto and Professor Xavier (Patrick Stewart, Death Train). But much of the film's length is devoted to the second story of Phoenix, the personification of Jean Grey (Famke Janssen, I Spy)'s subconcious. An attempt is made to promote Phoenix as the big threat of the film, and the emotional climax does revolve around her. But for me it fell flat. For whatever reason I just couldn't bring myself to care about that character, because I never cared about Jean.

That unsympathetic central character aside, X3 is brilliant. It's so good that I'm going to see it again tomorrow. It lives up to the expectations set by the first two, and it goes in some daring directions. (This is the bit where I don't tell you about the fact that *spoiler*, *spoiler* and *spoiler* are *spoiler*ed, and *spoiler* and *spoiler* get *spoiler*ed).

If you just want the one-line review: Beast == teh cool.

Comments:
Fri, 26th May 2006 (22:37)

Was it my imagination or did you pick some of the most obscure reference points of the above mentioned actors careers? Other than that, a good review and I will certainly see this before seeing (yuck) the Da Vinci code.

by Ronan Lowe
Fri, 26th May 2006 (22:46)

I wanted to put in the Death Train reference, so the others followed from there. :D

I would have been reviewing The DaVinci Code, but I read the first two pages of the book and threw it away in disgust. I prefer to read books by people with at least the command of English that I have. I wish I could trust Ritchie Cunningham to make a good film of it, but the critics (the *real* critics) don't give me much hope.

by Rory
Sat, 27th May 2006 (08:44)

I had a similar problem with the book, the constant self-indulgent references to the lead character as "looking like Harrison Ford in a tweed jacket" made me want to puke.

"Oh please pelase put Harrison Ford in the Movie of my book based on the character through whose exploits I vicariously live and by proxy make me Harrison Ford" - Pleb.

Anyway, dont bother with the movie either, by all accounts The Freckled Fool didnt even read the damn book yet STILL maaged to make an appalling film. And Tom Hanks has this really peculiar Travolta in Swordfish hair thing going on.

by Ronan Lowe
Mon, 29th May 2006 (15:26)

Ok, it might be a little late to say this but …. Ha ha, Death Train! I love it!

by Karl Melady

About this post

This piece was posted on Fri, 26th May 2006 at 22:09. It is tagged with and .

You can find other posts at the front page or, if you're feeling lucky, check out a random post.