The following entries were tagged with “music”. They are displayed with the most recent entries first. (1–8)

Muppets

Posted in , and on Sat, 26th Apr 2008 at 11:04

A great Muppet classic:

Comments:
Mon, 28th Apr 2008 (08:31)

I agree with aquarion.

… well done ;)

by Ronan Lowe
Tue, 29th Apr 2008 (12:28)

Jerk, I can't believe you did it again! First the circle game and now this?! I knew as soon as it started loading that I was about to be had!

Well played!

by Karl
Fri, 02nd May 2008 (15:14)

Note to self. Don't click on stuff from Rory. Like, ever.

Cxx

by Claire

Jocoloco

Posted in , , and on Sat, 29th Mar 2008 at 18:51

A few hours before Jonathan Coulton performed his very first gig in the UK ever (And the first outside the states, I believe), he bought a Tenori-on which is apparently only available over there.

This means we ended up being the first people to ever see him perform playing with a new geeky toy. It looked very much like this:

I also, briefly, met Aquarion.

We also ended up with covers of The Saturday Boy and “Do They Know It’s Christmas Time?” The latter of which doesn’t appear to have made it to YouTube yet. Most of the rest of the concert did, though

Comments:

Ignore Podcasts with iScrobbler

Posted in , , and on Thu, 01st Mar 2007 at 23:20

For those who don't know, iScrobbler is a plugin for iTunes for sending information about your listening habits to Last.fm. It runs in the background and sends a notification to Last.fm every time you play a track. By doing this for long enough, the service builds a very good picture of your music preferences which it uses to link you with other people with similar tastes, to recommend new music to you that's similar to what you like, and to inform you of upcoming events you might be interested in.

I use the Last.fm/iScrobbler service to supply the infobox on Soylent Red telling you what I recently listened to. But I like to listen to podcasts in iTunes and I'd prefer if these didn't show up on Soylent Red (not because I have anything to hide—I don't care if you guys know when I'm listening to Macbreak Weekly—but because that's not what that part of the site is for). After a bit of poking around I discovered a set of hidden preferences for iScrobbler, including the ability to filter tracks by artist, genre or file path.

Read the whole linked page for the details, but if you only want to filter out podcasts, here's how:

  1. Quit iScrobbler
  2. Open a terminal and type the command:
    defaults write org.flexistentialist.iscrobbler "Track Filters" '("Podcast")'
  3. Start iScrobbler

Simple as that! Now your podcasts will stop showing up on Last.fm.

Another One Bites the Interstellar Dust

Posted in , and on Thu, 02nd Nov 2006 at 13:55

Bang! The Complete History of the Universe is a new popular science book about the origins and development of the universe for a lay audience. So far, so, "I've read it all before." What's interesting is the list of authors, which includes legendary glam rock guitar god Brian May—sorry, Dr Brian May—of Queen.

Alternative headlines for this post were: "Prince of the Universe"; "A Kind of Science"; "Radio Telescope Ga-Ga"; and "Brian May Has a Sodding Doctorate in Astrophysics"

Comments:
Thu, 02nd Nov 2006 (18:25)

Didn't you know that?

by Joe
Thu, 02nd Nov 2006 (18:30)

Don't spoil my fun, Joe.

by Rory
Fri, 03rd Nov 2006 (14:39)

Maybe we've overlooked Gary's guitar genius!

by Joe
Tue, 07th Nov 2006 (10:18)

Haahhahahahahhahahahahhaahhaahahhaahhaa Sorry Gary…

Tue, 07th Nov 2006 (17:59)

Everyone in astrophysics has an innate musical talent. Haven't you ever seen Patrick Moore playing the xylophone? http://www.weebls-stuff.com/toons/patrick+moore/

by Gary

Freddy Mercury's 60th Birthday

Posted in on Tue, 05th Sep 2006 at 17:31

Today would have been Freddie Mercury's 60th birthday.

Mercury, with Queen, can pretty much be credited for any interest I might have in music. For a long time they were the only band I listened to. I spent part of the summer of 1997 in Slovenia with my parents. We would drive our rental car from our hotel to the interesting parts of the country, me in the back listening to Queen Rocks on my then-new Sony discman. Even then I attached particular significance to "No One But You", the surviving band-members' tribute to Mercury.

To this day there is more Queen in my CD collection than any other artist. If anything can be considered to be my all-time favourite song, "Bohemian Rhapsody must surely be it. My pubescent unrequited crushes were made bearable by endless listening to "You're My Best Friend" and "Somebody to Love". "Fat Bottomed Girls" gave me my... um... healthy body image. Yes, that will do.

Needless to say Queen will be on heavy rotation in iTunes today.

Comments:
Wed, 06th Sep 2006 (07:28)

Heres to the big toothed Archangel of rock!

/raises a glass

by Ronan Lowe

Pearl Jam and Radiohead

Posted in on Fri, 25th Aug 2006 at 15:04

I went to see Pearl Jam in The Point on Wednesday, and then to Radiohead in Marley Park yesterday. Both were good, but Pearl Jam were better.

It was the first time Pearl Jam had played in Ireland in six years. Since I only listened to them for the first time about four years ago this was obviously my first time seeing them live. I'm sorry to say that my knowledge of their music is pretty much limited to Ten and their new, self-titled album, so there was quite a lot of unfamiliar material for me. Still, they played everything I wanted to hear and I got to sing along to the one song that I actually know the words to, "Alive". We were treated to their interpretation of "The Boys Are Back in Town" during the second encore.

Radiohead were good, but there was more filler than I would have liked. There was one sequence of two or three songs during which I pretty much switched off and stopped listening. Partly because there were a couple of songs I didn't know and partly because some of their songs are just difficult. They still covered all of my favourites. Easy enough, given that I tend to like their most popular songs. I'm told that they don't tend to play "Creep", but they've played it both times I've seen them.

Machine Learning Applied to Music Players

Posted in on Thu, 29th Jun 2006 at 17:55

I want a music player that doesn't require me to explicitly rate songs by assigning them a number of stars or some such nonsense. I want it to keep an internal representation of ratings and to gather data implicitly to alter those ratings. A song's rating should go up when the song is played. It should go down when the song is skipped over. It should go up when I raise the volume just after it starts playing. It should relate the rating for one song to the ratings of other songs by the same artist, or in the same genre.

If iTunes had been paying attention to all of my actions so far it would know that when I add a new Foo Fighters song to my music library there's a fairly freaking good chance that I'm going to like it more than average. If I started skipping over it a lot (possibly because it's one of the crappy acoustic songs from the second CD of In Your Honour) it should have adjusted the rating to reflect that.

Software throws out too much useful information about user behaviour.

Comments:
Thu, 29th Jun 2006 (22:00)

I agree… especially when i hear people say in work on a daily basis "It should just know…"

Fri, 30th Jun 2006 (08:54)

well… it should.

Am I misguided in thinking that the fact that media players are various flavours of free hampers their development?

It seems to me that virtually every program that I use would benefit from learning behaviour, from Word to Firefox. I mean, if I accidentally mispell a URL, couldn't it figure it out?

by SJ
Fri, 30th Jun 2006 (10:16)

SJ, the problem is that creating any sort of useful learning behaviour is really hard. Programmers are used to absolutes: if the use types in address A then go to address A. Sometimes they stretch as far as heuristics: if some piece of text starts with "www." then it's probably a URL so turn it into a link. Heuristics can be handy, but they can be annoying when they get things wrong ("I'm not writing a fucking letter you stupid fucking paperclip!")

Proper learning is much harder than coming up with simple heuristics ahead of time. A program that has learned some rules is inscrutable when it starts to make mistakes. Ever see a ham email marked as spam and wonder how the hell any sort of program could have thought it was spam? In most types of learning system is just about impossible to find out why a certain decision was made (An exception is Amazon's recommendation system, which can tell you why it recommended any product to you).

Because a learning system is harder to get right and because it's generally more random-seeming when it makes mistakes, most will just end up annoying users. The only way around that is to be so useful that it makes up for annoying mistakes.

I never said it would be easy. I just said that someone other than me should do it. For free.

by Rory
Fri, 30th Jun 2006 (13:07)

You get email about ham?

by Ronan Lowe
Fri, 30th Jun 2006 (13:09)

Not often, but I do get the occasional email that was written by a human being.

by Rory
Sat, 01st Jul 2006 (01:14)

pork products aside, I'm just saying that basic learning behaviour is a good thing. Google now knows what I mean when I mangle a word; but it also doesn't deny me the opportunity to see the results for my mangled word. Firefox should do the same - it's be great if i never had to accidentaly visit a sqatter site on, for example gamefqas.com again.

Conversely, Word is forever turning my few underscores (for the Boss to sign on) into a big bold line. It does let me turn this option off, but not that easily. Still I wish it would have figured out what I want by now.

Tangentially, is there a single recorded case of Microsoft's troubleshooters actually helping anyone to solve a problem everlikeever?

Also, couldn't your comments thingy put the http:// but in for me? even internet explorer does that…

by SJ

Nirvana on Top of the Pops

Posted in and on Sat, 24th Jun 2006 at 15:18

Somewhere in the discussion of the demise of Top of the Pops I came across a link to Nirvana's performance of Smells Like Teen Spirit on the show.

Top of the Pops didn't allow bands to perform their music live, instead forcing them to sing and mime to pre-recorded music. So Kurt Cobain completely took the piss with his singing, while the whole band mimed their instrument-playing as badly as they could. Cobain doesn't even pretend to play a whole chunk of the song. Krist Novoselic spends most of the performance swinging his bass around his head. It's hard to tell from the YouTube video but apparently the bass didn't even have any strings on it. Stick it to the man!

By the way, this is my 500th post to Soylent Red.

Comments:
Sun, 25th Jun 2006 (11:32)

Yeah i saw that vid a good while ago. Its brilliant. Love the way he sang the whole song about an octave lower and Dave Grohl whith his hilarious drumming.

by Stephen Bourke